{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"Report on the SI’s Theater of Operations\n","author_name":"Reuben Keehan (translation) \u25aa \nAttila Kot\u00e1nyi","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/report-on-the-si-s-theater-of.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/report-on-the-si-s-theater-of.html'\u003EReport on the SI’s Theater of Operations\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EI should point out that what I’m about to read has already largely been discussed within the SI, and therefore that it has lost a good deal of its interest. Please excuse me for this. I’ll confine myself to three proposals for “situating” the Situationist International itself within all other artistic and political problems.\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003EFundamentally, I ask that we consider:\n\n\u003Cbr \/\u003Ea) the SI as a materially equipped encounter (which is also a passion and a denunciation), with the accent on \u003Ca href=\"..\/report-on-the-si-s-theater-of.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}