{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"Reform and Counter-reform in Bureaucratic Power\n","author_name":"Gyllene Flottan (translation) \u25aa \nSituationistische Internationale","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/reform-and-counter-reform-in.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/reform-and-counter-reform-in.html'\u003EReform and Counter-reform in Bureaucratic Power\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EOne could say that the only task of the history of the last twenty years was to refute Trotsky’s analysis of the bureaucracy. As a victim of “class subjectivism,” he \u2014 for his whole life \u2014 regarded Stalinist practice as just a temporary deviation by a stratum of usurpers, a “Thermidorian reaction.” As the ideologist of the Bolshevik Revolution, Trotsky could never be the theoretician of the proletarian revolution at the time of the Stalinist restoration. By refusing to admit what the \u003Ca href=\"..\/reform-and-counter-reform-in.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}