{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"Critique of Urbanism\n","author_name":"John Shepley (translation) \u25aa \nSituationistische Internationale","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/critique-of-urbanism.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/licra.contextxxi.org\/critique-of-urbanism.html'\u003ECritique of Urbanism\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EThe situationists have always said that “unitary urbanism is not a doctrine of urbanism but a critique of urbanism” (Internationale Situationniste 3 [Unitary Urbanism at the End of the 1950s]). The project of a more modern, more progressive urbanism, conceived as a corrective to the present urbanist specialization, is as false as, for example, in the revolutionary project, the overestimation of the moment for seizing power, which is a specialist’s idea that immediately involves \u003Ca href=\"..\/critique-of-urbanism.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}